STEAM-GRUPPE
Review Bomb Tracking / Off Topic RevBombOff
STEAM-GRUPPE
Review Bomb Tracking / Off Topic RevBombOff
6
IM SPIEL
78
ONLINE
Gegründet
5. Dezember 2019
Sprache
Englisch
14 Kommentare
24. Apr. 2025 um 16:19 
Thanks for letting me know! Should be fixed now.
24. Apr. 2025 um 15:14 
Hey, ya didn't put the "Review Bomb Tracking" group link properly.

https://aqua.hsduabhb-nmzhi.cf/groups/Review_Bomb_Tracking_Off_Topic
10. Jan. 2025 um 17:00 
Would you be willing to include the excess of bot reviews on games like DOTA and CSGO?
19. Sep. 2024 um 6:47 
@Lily I think you got my group confused with one of those "anti woke" groups

My curator is dedicated to providing more context to review bombs and off topic review bombs, nothing more. Everything here is informational.
18. Sep. 2024 um 17:08 
Its hilarious how this is a group supposedly dedicated to "combating review bombing" yet I literally arrived here because some of your members are review bombing "SJW/woke" games lmfao. (How dare gay people/other races exist!!)

Y'all should just say outright you enjoy discriminating against people and mindlessly prop up things that share your ignorant world views. Brainless right-wing pole smokers.. xD
16. Aug. 2024 um 1:02 
keep up the good work!!
ensure you always stay impartial, and explain ALL review bombs, don't shy away from detailing any.
23. Jun. 2024 um 13:11 
@invadator Thank you for your kind words
20. Jun. 2024 um 2:14 
Keep up the good work
29. Jun. 2023 um 20:35 
@Black-Photon That is precisely why I made such a curator, because an asterisk doesn't explain while people were review bombing. I do my best to always make sure there is a source attached to my curations to add further context because 200 characters isn't enough space to explain everything.
11. Jun. 2023 um 15:25 
Just discovered review bombing and just wanted to say I'm really glad there's a page like this outlining the reasons for any review bombing. I'd personally like to know why an incident has happened and it's frustrating that steam doesn't have a way of quickly finding them. Most probably aren't relevant to the game quality, but it's good to know in case it's of interest - eg. in the Skyrim paid mods incident.
10. Dez. 2019 um 17:50 
True the overall issue of the damaging customer's trust still remains, but I do want to let people know that the issue people had with the game at one point was fixed. Then a customer can decided from there if they still want to buy the game since the problem was fixed or not because they still dont want to support a company for bad practices.
10. Dez. 2019 um 13:31 
Just a suggestion: I would consider not using the phrase "The issue is resolved" because, well, it isn't true. No matter how much a studio might try to backtrack on a bad idea, the fact is they've still made that bad idea, and people remember. No amount of patching can repair tarnished reputations or restore customer faith in an anticonsumer company that does not deserve it.
6. Dez. 2019 um 7:41 
If you are talking about positive review bombing (like the assassins creed unity stuff) then yes
6. Dez. 2019 um 6:29 
Question: will this Curator also address flooding games' store pages with unmerited positive reviews? Because that's an issue, too, and of course, publishers never bring it up.